Leading Criminal Defense Attorney Mike Murray Results. Call me now at: (508) 393-4162.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1287 CR 0441, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI), Second Offense, having recorded a breath test of .24*.

DISMISSED:  In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2362 CR 3719, Charges of Assault and Battery with a Dangerous Weapon (2 Counts) against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 0867 CR 0403, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Possession of a Handgun*. Prior to this NOT GUILTY verdict my client was facing a mandatory minimum period of incarceration of EIGHTEEN MONTHS (18).

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Superior Court Docket No. 13-0499-1, charges of Trafficking in Heroin against my client were DISMISSED. Prior to DISMISSAL of this matter my client was facing a MANDATORY MINIMUM THREE AND ONE HALF YEARS (3 1/2) IN STATE PRISON – up to TWENTY YEARS (20).*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No.  1667 CR 0188,  Charges of Rape which were amended to Indecent Assault & Battery (A&B), Assault & Battery on a Disabled Person and Strangulation against my client were DISMISSED on the day of Trial.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 CR 1191, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Assault & Battery on a Police Officer (A&B PO) and Not Guilty of Assault & Battery with a Dangerous Weapon (A&B DW)*. In this matter my client was faced with two serious felony charges in which the police officer alleged that my client had intentionally tried to run him over at a construction site. However, after playing the officer’s tape recorded emergency call to the jury and pointing out his significantly inconsistent statements, both on the tape itself and then in his police report, the jury returned with a verdicts of NOT GUILTY within minutes of the lunch break – they were sent to deliberate at the beginning of lunch they returned with a verdict before their lunch had ended.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1961 CR 0108, Charges of Possession of a Firearm without an FID Card in Violation of M.G.L. c. 269 §10(h), (2 counts), Possession of Ammunition without an FID Card in Violation of M.G.L. c. 269 §10(h)(1), Possession with Intent to Distribute a Class A Substance in Violation of M.G.L. c. 94C §32(a), and Receiving Stolen Property (Firearms) in Violation of M.G.L. c. 266 §60 against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial.*

In this matter 18 Members if the DEA (Drug Enforcement Agency High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (DEA HIDTA)) the Massachusetts State Police and North Worcester County Drug Task Force (NWCDTF), executed a search warrant upon a residence.  The only person able to connect our client to this residence was the resident of the premises, a known drug user.   This person identified our client through an unconstitutional identification procedure and we were able to have the identification suppressed.  Lacking this evidence, the Prosecution was unable to proceed to trial.  ALL CHARGES DISMISSED AGAINST OUR CLIENT WHO WAS FACING MORE THAN TEN (10) YEARS IN PRISON

SUPPRESSED:  In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2367 CR 1720, All evidence seized after a warrantless stop and search of my client who was arrested for OUI and for Carrying a Firearm While Intoxicated, were SUPPRESSED and therefore inadmissible against him at trial .*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1866 CR 0458, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Drugs, Third Offense (OUID)*. PRIOR TO WINING THIS TRIAL MY CLIENT WAS FACING A MANDATORY MINIMUM SIX (6) MONTHS IN JAIL UP TO TWO AND A HALF YEARS.

MOTION TO SUPRESS ALLOWED – ALL CHARGES DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1967 CR 0923, SEVENTEEN (17) COUNTS OF POSSESSION OF A FIREARM WITHOUT A LICENSE AND IMPROPER STORAGE OF A FIREARM against my client were DISMISSED on the ALLOWANCE OF OUR MOTION TO SUPPRESS – ALL CHARGES DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1866 CR 2001, Charges of Assault and Battery (A&B) with a Dangerous Weapon (Handgun) and Charges of Assault and Battery (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2448 CR 0031, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI), Third Offense*.    In this matter after the jury posed 3 questions to the court they returned within 5 minutes with a unanimous verdict of NOT GUILTY.  Charges of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) while License Suspended for Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol were DISMISSED.  In this matter prior to the jury’s decision and several amendments and this dismissal, my client was facing a mandatory MINIMUM ONE AND ONE HALF (1.5) YEARS IN THE HOUSE OF CORRECTION with no good time or early release/parole credits as well at a THRTEEN YEAR LOSS OF LICENSE.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. (Woburn D.C. No Probable Cause), Charges of Assault and Battery (A&B) with Serious Bodily Injury against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2267 CR 1008, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI), Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle and Child Endangerment While Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI), having recorded a breath test of .19*.   In this matter my client was facing a mandatory minimum Ninety (90) Days in the house of correction if convicted.  Having been found NOT GUILTY of ALL CHARGES my client walked out the front door.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1853 CR 1878, Charges of Assault & Battery with a Dangerous Weapon (Automobile) and Reckless Operation of a Motor Vehicle against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial.*

In this matter (1853 CR 1878), the alleged victim was badly injured when my client hit him with his vehicle. However, as always, we prepared a vigorous defense by acquiring the alleged victim’s lengthy criminal records and providing the same to the prosecution to secure our theory of Self Defense in this ‘road rage’ conflict. We also acquired a videotape of the incident showing that the ALLEGED VICTIM was actually the primary aggressor. After acquiring this evidence and answering ‘ready for trial’, we were able to negotiate a little known and rarely used tool called an Accord & Satisfaction gaining a DISMISSAL OF ALL CHARGES PRIOR TO TRIAL.

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No.  1667 CR 0435,  our Motion in Limine to exclude breath test results was ALLOWED. Our client’s Breath Test Results of .27 are suppressed and inadmissible against him at trial.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1767 CR 0541, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI), Second Offense, despite having recorded a breath test of .23*. Charges of Negligent Operation against my client were dismissed prior to trial. In this matter despite the fact that my client failed all Field Sobriety Tests (FST’s) including the alphabet test the Jury deliberated for approximately 10 minutes before the lunch break and returned immediately after the lunch break with a verdict of NOT GUILTY.*

ALLOWED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1767 CR 1073, after hearing our Motion for Relief from Global Positioning System (GPS) Monitoring was ALLOWED. My client who was sentenced to three years of probation with GPS monitoring was immediately relived of the requirement of wearing a GPS ankle bracelet. This system (GPS Monitoring) is extremely intrusive, limiting and punitive. The Massachusetts Supreme Court has recently ruled that GPS monitoring is a search subject to Constitutional review under the 4th and 14th Amendments of the United States Constitution and Article 14 of the Massachusetts declaration of Rights.

GPS monitoring is not a minimally invasive search. Accordingly, art. 14 requires individualized determinations of reasonableness in order to impose GPS monitoring as a condition of probation. Mandatory, blanket imposition of GPS monitoring on probationers, absent individualized determinations of reasonableness, is unconstitutional under the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights.*

If you have been subject to GPS Monitoring as a Condition of your probation, contact me now to determine if you are eligible for relief from GPS Monitoring.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2167 CR 0072, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol, (OUI, DUI or DWI), having recorded a breath test of .23*.

DISMISSED:  In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2434 CR 1088, Charges of Assault and Battery in Violation of an Abuse Prevention Order, Violation of an Abuse Prevention Order and Domestic Assault and Battery – Subsequent Offense against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1367 CR 1907, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI), having recorded a breath test of .23*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2049 CR 1295, our Motion to Dismiss was ALLOWED.  Four (4) Separate counts of Assault with a Firearm, against my client were DISMISSED,*  upon our Motion to Dismiss, pursuant to the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, Article XI of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights and Rule 36(b) of the Massachusetts Rules of Criminal Procedure.  Our motion to dismiss on this basis was ALLOWED, ALL CHARGES DISMISSED.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1967 CR 1400, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Felony Charges of Intimidation of a Witness and Assault & Battery on a Family or Household Member.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1567 CR 1563, Charges of Assault & Battery on a Police Officer (A&B PO) against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1248 CR 0688, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI), Fourth Offense, having recorded a breath test of .21*. IN THIS MATTER, MY CLIENT WAS A HARVARD LAW SCHOOL GRADUATE AND EXPERIENCED LAWYER.

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2367 CR 1721, our Motion to Suppress Breath Test Results, filed on behalf of my client charged with Operating Under the Influence (OUI, DUI, DWI or “Drunk Driving”), was ALLOWED. All evidence of my client’s Breath Test Results of .22 were SUPPRESSED and therefore, inadmissible against him at trial.* If you have been accused of OUI and have taken the breath test (Breathalyzer) you must hire a lawyer with a thorough understanding of the Dräger Alcotest 9510, the requirements for admissibility of breath tests taken by this machine, and how to attempt to Suppress these results pursuant to Massachusetts General Law, Chapter 90, §24k, 501 Code Mass. Regs. §2.55. and Com. v. Pierre, 72 Mass.App.Ct. 230, 890 N.E.2d 152 (2008).

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2121 CR 1147, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI), having recorded a breath test of .21*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1367 CR 0386, Charges of Possession of a Handgun and Violation of an Abuse Prevention Order against my client were DISMISSED.* Prior to DISMISSAL of this matter my client was facing a mandatory minimum period of incarceration of EIGHTEEN MONTHS (18).

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1162 CR 8095, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Indecent Assault & Battery (A&B)*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Superior Court Docket No. 13-0499-2, charges of Trafficking in Opium against my client were DISMISSED. Prior to DISMISSAL of this matter my client was facing a MANDATORY MINIMUM THREE AND ONE HALF YEARS (3 1/2) IN STATE PRISON – up to TWENTY YEARS (20).*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1562 CR 2632, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Drugs SECOND OFFENSE (OUID, DUID or DWID) and Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle, despite admitting to taking Percocet.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No.  1667 CR 1064  Charges of Indecent Assault & Battery (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2267 CR 0819, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Indecent Assault and Battery on a Person over Fourteen Years of Age*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2167 CR 1038, Charges of Witness Intimidation (Felony), Assault & Battery and Malicious Destruction of Property against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2167 CR 1052, Charges of Assault & Battery against my client were DISMISSED .*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1767 CR 0874, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Assault & Battery with a Dangerous Weapon and Domestic Assault & Battery (A&B DW and Domestic A&B).*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1965 CR 1026, Charges of Assault & Battery against my client were DISMISSED PRIOR TO ARRAIGNMENT.* In this matter we negotiated a little known and rarely used tool called an Accord & Satisfaction. By negotiating and entering the Accord & Satisfaction with a dismissal prior to arraignment no record of the charges exists on my client’s criminal record.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1667 CR 1307, Two Counts of Violation of an Abuse Prevention Order (209A Order) against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1667 CR 1396, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Domestic Assault and Battery (Dom. A&B). In this matter the Jury deliberated for approximately 10 minutes before returning with a unanimous verdict of NOT GUILTY on behalf of my client. Felony charges of Intimidation of a Witness were DISMISSED prior to trial.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1448 CR 1665, charges of Operating Under the Influence of Drugs (OUID) against my client were DISMISSED on the date of trial.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1367 CR 0765, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI) and Leaving the Scene of Property Damage having recorded a breath test of .21*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1267 CR 1033, Charges of Assault and Battery (A&B), and Intimidation of a Witness against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2464 CR 0345, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI), Second Offense, despite having recorded a breath test of .20*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1367 CR 0013, charges of Possession With Intent to Distribute a against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1321 CR 0388, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI), Second Offense, having recorded a breath test of .20*.

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2464 CR 0345, our Motion to Suppress Breath Test Results, filed on behalf of my client charged with Operating Under the Influence (OUI, DUI, DWI or “Drunk Driving”), was ALLOWED. All evidence of my client’s Breath Test Results of .20 were SUPPRESSED and therefore, inadmissible against her at trial.* If you have been accused of OUI and have taken the breath test (Breathalyzer) you must hire a lawyer with a thorough understanding of the Dräger Alcotest 9510, the requirements for admissibility of breath tests taken by this machine, and how to attempt to Suppress these results pursuant to Massachusetts General Law, Chapter 90, §24k, 501 Code Mass. Regs. §2.55. and Com. v. Pierre, 72 Mass.App.Ct. 230, 890 N.E.2d 152 (2008).

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1967 CR 1454, Charges of Mayhem (A pure felony) against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2465 CR 0100, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI), despite having recorded a breath test of .19*.

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No.  2367 CR 1193,  our Motion in Limine to exclude breath test results was ALLOWED. Our client’s Breath Test Results of .18 are suppressed and inadmissible against him at trial.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1267 CR 0713, charges of Possession With Intent to Distribute a Class D Substance and Possession of a Class D Substance against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1448 CR 0177, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI), and Resisting Arrest*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1248 CR 1344, charges of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) While License Suspended for OUI, against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial, my client having recorded a breath test of .21*.  PRIOR TO DISMISSAL OF THIS CHARGE MY CLIENT WAS FACING A MANDATORY MINIMUM ONE YEAR PERIOD OF INCARCERATION IN THE HOUSE OF CORRECTION.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Superior Court Docket No. 13-0499-3, charges of Possession of Cocaine with Intent to Distribute against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1449 CR 0575, Charges of Indecent Assault and Battery (Indecent A&B) against my client were DISMISSED.*

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, , Superior Court Docket No. 13-0499-1, our Motion to Suppress All Evidence, filed on behalf of my client charged with Trafficking in Heroin was ALLOWED. All evidence, drugs and contraband, seized from my client as a result of a warrantless search and seizure were SUPPRESSED and therefore, inadmissible against him at trial. ALL CHARGES DISMISSED. Prior to DISMISSAL of this matter my client was facing a MANDATORY MINIMUM THREE AND ONE HALF YEARS (3 1/2) IN STATE PRISON – up to TWENTY YEARS (20).*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 CR 1131, Charges of Assault and Battery against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Superior Court Docket No.: 2181 CR 00444, Charges of Larceny Over $1,200.00 and Conspiracy against my client were DISMISSED.*

In this matter my client was indicted by a grand jury for Larceny Over $1200.00 by Single Scheme in violation of M.G.L. c.266, §30 alleging he stole over $170,000.00, “DUE FOR THE PROVISION OF TRUCKING SERVICES.”  We filed a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Mass.R.Crim.P. 13, Commonwealth v. Gary Geane, 51 Mass. App. Ct. 149, 2001; Commonwealth v. DiBennadetto, 436 Mass. 310, 313 (2002); and Commonwealth v. McCarthy, 385 Mass. 160, 163 (1982); arguing that:

1. The Indictment was Fatally and Irretrievably Flawed as there is no crime of “Larceny of Services”, Commonwealth v. Gary Geane, 51 Mass. App. Ct. 149, 2001.
2. As there is no crime of Larceny of Services, Geane, Supra, the defendants cannot be indicted or convicted to conspire toward an action or actions not a crime.
3. The evidence presented to the Grand Jury was incorrect and was not sufficient to establish probable cause that the Defendant committed these offenses.

The Court ALLOWED our motion to DISMISS all charges.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1667 CR 1213, Charges of Assault & Battery (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 0867 CR 2360, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) having recorded a breath test of .20*.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2349 CR 2060, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI), despite having recorded a breath test of .19*.    In this matter it took the Jury approximately 35 minutes to return with a unanimous verdict of NOT GUILTY. (They were at lunch)

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1267 CR 0685, Charges of Assault and Battery (A&B), and Threatening to Commit a Crime against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2148 CR 0255, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol, Third Offense and Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol – Child Endangerment, despite recording a breath test of .19.*  In this matter my client was facing a mandatory minimum of EIGHT MONTHS in jail.  Client found not guilty of all charges.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No.:  2367 CR 0300, Charges of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI) SECOND OFFENSE and Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle were dismissed based upon our Motion to Dismiss.*  In this matter, while at the police station, our client was not afforded his right to a doctor or a telephone call pursuant to  M.G.L. c. 263, § 5(A), and M.G.L. c. 276, §33A.  Also, during this time my client was subject to a barrage of abusive behavior by the officers present – on video.  Despite the fact that my client registered a breath test result of .19 and was facing a mandatory minimum 60 days in the house of correction (which could be served as two weeks in an alcohol education facility), a mandatory minimum 2-year license loss, and 2 years or probation, ALL CHARGES were DISMISSED, NO LICENSE LOSS – CASE CLOSED.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No.:  2355 CR 1116, Charges of Possession of a Class B Substance (2 Counts) against my client were DISMISSED PRIOR TO ARRAIGNMENT based upon our Rule 3(g) Motion to Dismiss.*  In this matter our client was charged with purchasing Class B Substances from a dealer while under surveillance.  Our client was not arrested at the scene and was not provided with the protections of a clerk magistrate’s hearing.  As a result, the case was dismissed prior to arraignment when our motion to dismiss was ALLOWED.  Because the matter was dismissed PRIOR TO ARRAIGNMENT our client has no criminal record of this matter.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1667 CR 0848, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI) and Operating After License Suspension having recorded a breath test of .19*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2467 CR 0014, Charges of Assault & Battery against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2264 CR 2836, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Drugs (OUID)*.  It is difficult for the Prosecution to prove OUI Drugs charges at trial without a blood test and expert testimony to interpret those tests before a jury. At a minimum the Commonwealth would need to present: (1) reliable evidence as to the amount or concentration of the drug in the defendant’s system; and (2) expert testimony indicating that the concentration of the drug in the defendant’s system would impair his or her ability to operate a motor vehicle.  No Such evidence exists in most OUID cases. The police officer IS NOT AN EXPERT. Hire an OUID lawyer with experience and a thorough understanding of the OUI Drugs law in Massachusetts and what the Prosecution must do to prove these crimes.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1667 CR 0934, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) having recorded a breath test of .19*

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, , Superior Court Docket No. 13-0499-2, our Motion to Suppress All Evidence, filed on behalf of my client charged with Trafficking in Opium was ALLOWED. All evidence, drugs and contraband, seized from my client as a result of a warrantless search and seizure were SUPPRESSED and therefore, inadmissible against him at trial. ALL CHARGES DISMISSED. Prior to DISMISSAL of this matter my client was facing a MANDATORY MINIMUM THREE AND ONE HALF YEARS (3 1/2) IN STATE PRISON – up to TWENTY YEARS (20).*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 0967 CR 1071, charges of Assault and Battery with a Dangerous Weapon – Knife (A&B DW) against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1567 CR 1228, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Drugs THIRD OFFENSE (OUID, DUID or DWID), despite testing positive for: Cocaine, Opiates, Cannabis, and 17 other drugs.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No.  1649 CR 2489,  Charges of Assault & Battery (A&B) and Strangulation against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial.*

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1367 CR 0013, our Motion to Suppress filed on behalf of my client was ALLOWED.  All evidence, drugs and contraband, seized from my client as a result of a warrantless search and seizure were SUPPRESSED and therefore, inadmissible against him at trial.*  CASE DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1167 CR 1788, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Assault & Battery with a Dangerous Weapon (A&B DW) and Threatening to Commit Murder*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1662 CR 5254, Charges of Unarmed Robbery, Assault & Battery and Vandalism against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1768 CR 1251, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI), Second Offense having recorded a breath test of .18*.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1667 CR 0467, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) having recorded a breath test of .18*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1267 CR 1880, charges of Assault and Battery (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1967 CR 1470, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI) and Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle having recorded a breath test of .17*.

SUPPRESSED AND ORDERED TO BE DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2347 CR 1336, ALL EVIDENCE seized after the police wrongfully stopped my client was SUPPRESSED by order of the court and Charges of Operating Under the Influence (OUI, DUI, DWI or “Drunk Driving”), and Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle against my client were ORDERED to be DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2267 CR 0166, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Drugs.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 CR 0234, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI), Second Offense having recorded a breath test of .17.*

DISMISSED:  In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2462 CR 1259, Charges of Assault & Battery against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1067 CR 1119, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) having recorded a breath test of .17*.

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1321 CR 0388, our Motion to Suppress Breathalyzer Test Results was ALLOWED.  All evidence of a Breathalyzer Test administered to my client were SUPPRESSED and therefore, the Breathalyzer Test results of .20 and .18 are inadmissible against him at trial.*  The Judge in his order indicated that the Hudson Massachusetts Police department should reconfigure the Booking/ Breathalyzer Test area to better comply with the C.M.R.  ANYONE ARRESTED FOR OPERATING UNDER THE INFLUENCE IN HUDSON, MASSACHUSETTS (OUI, DUI, DWI OR “DRUNK DRIVING”) WHO SUBMITTED TO A BREATHALYZER TEST SHOULD IMMEDIATELY CONSIDER FILING A MOTION TO SUPPRESS BREATHALYZER TEST RESULTS.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2367 CR 1399, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI), Second Offense, despite having recorded a breath test of .16*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2367 CR 1495, Charges of Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI, DWI or Drunk Driving) against my client were DISMISSED despite my client registering a Breath Test of .15.*  In this matter we filed a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to M.G.L. c. 90C, § 2, the Massachusetts “No Fix” Statute.  In every OUI case the police are required to issue a Massachusetts Uniform Traffic Citation “citing” the arrestee with OUI.  In this matter the police cited the Defendant with Negligent Operation NOT OUI and then charged him with OUI NOT Negligent Operation.  The Judge allowed our Motion.  CASE DISMISSED.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 CR 0141, Charges of Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol, Third Offense, against my client were DISMISSED.* In this matter despite having recorded a breath test of .16, admissions and significant other evidence we filed a motion to have my client’s legal competency evaluated. Prior to the evaluation, my client was facing a MANDATORY MINIMUM SIX MONTHS IN THE HOUSE OF CORRECTION UP TO TWO AND ONE-HALF YEARS. After evaluation by a court appointed psychiatrist, my client was found to lack the competence necessary to stand trial. As a result, all charges were DISMISSED as a result of our motion to dismiss all charges.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2267 CR 0898, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI)* despite recording a breath test of .15.

DISMISSED:  In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2416 CR 0410, Charges of Assault with a Dangerous Weapon and Domestic Assault and Battery against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2267 CR 1093, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol despite being involved in a serious accident and registering a breath test result of .15 .*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2167 CR 1184, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI), despite having recorded a breath test of .15*.  Charges of Negligent Operation against my client were dismissed prior to trial.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1367 CR 0339, charges of Violation of a 209A Abuse Prevention Order (“Violation of a Restraining Order”) against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1567 CR 1113, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) having recorded a breath test of .15*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No.  2067 CR 0707,  Charges of  Assault with a Dangerous Weapon and Witness Intimidation (Both Felonies) against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1967 CR 0591, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI), Second Offense, having recorded a breath test of .15*.

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2467 CR 0042, our Motion to Suppress Breath Test Results, filed on behalf of my client charged with Operating Under the Influence (OUI, DUI, DWI or “Drunk Driving”), was ALLOWED. All evidence of my client’s Breath Test Results of .15  were SUPPRESSED and therefore, inadmissible against him at trial.* If you have been accused of OUI and have taken the breath test (Breathalyzer) you must hire a lawyer with a thorough understanding of the Dräger Alcotest 9510, the requirements for admissibility of breath tests taken by this machine, and how to attempt to Suppress these results pursuant to Massachusetts General Law, Chapter 90, §24k, 501 Code Mass. Regs. §2.55. and Com. v. Pierre, 72 Mass.App.Ct. 230, 890 N.E.2d 152 (2008).

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 23 DL 0044 WC, Charges of Assault and Battery (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2267 CR 1415, Charges of Assault and Battery (A&B) on a Person 60 Years or Over with Injury, and Assault and Battery (A&B) with a Dangerous Weapon against my client were DISMISSED on the date of trial.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1767 CR 0763, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI), and Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle having recorded a breath test of .14*.

NOT IN VIOLATION OF PROBATION: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1267 CR 0823, after hearing, my client was found NOT IN VIOLATION OF PROBATION notwithstanding a subsequent arrest for TWELVE (12) COUNTS of Larceny and Identity Fraud while on probation.*   In this matter the Commonwealth was seeking a six (6) month period of incarceration for my client.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1767 CR 0437, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI) having recorded a breath test of .14*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1267 CR 0715, charges of Violation of a 209A Abuse Prevention Order (“Violation of a Restraining Order”) against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2367 CR 0474, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI), Second Offense, having recorded a breath test of .13*.   In this matter it took the Jury approximately 20 minutes to return with a unanimous verdict of NOT GUILTY.

DISMISSED:  In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2468 CR 0575, Charges of Assault and Threatening to Commit a Crime against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2121 CR 0694, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI), despite having driven his car into a parked vehicle.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2318 CR 4044, Charges of Domestic Assault and Battery (A&B)  against my client were DISMISSED on the day of Trial.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1467 CR 1654, the charges of Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI, DWI or “Drunk Driving”) and Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle against my client were DISMISSED despite recording a breath test of .14*. These charges were dismissed upon our Motion to Dismiss pursuant to M.G.L. c. 263, § 5(A) and Commonwealth v. Andrade, 389 Mass. 874, (1983).

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No.  1767 CR 0437,  our Motion in Limine to exclude breath test results was ALLOWED. Our client’s Breath Test Results of .14 are suppressed and inadmissible against him at trial.* Defendant found NOT GUILTY after trial.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2221 CR 0085, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI), having recorded a breath test of .13*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2367 CR 1421, Charges of Assault & Battery on a Family or Household Member (A&B Domestic) against my client were DISMISSED.*  In this matter ALL charges were DISMISSED PRIOR TO ARRAIGNMENT as a result of a referral and successful completion, by my client, of a Valor Act Diversion.  As a result,  no record of these charges exists.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2364 CR 3115, Charges of Assault & Battery on a Family or Household Member (A&B Domestic) against my client were DISMISSED as a result of our Rule 3(g) motion to dismiss. In this matter our client was arraigned for the above charges but was not arrested at the time of the incident.  He was not given the statutory right to a Clerk Magistrate hearing as required by MG.L. c. 218, § 35A, Mass.R.Crim.Pro. 3(g) and  Commonwealth v. DiBennadetto, 436 Mass. 310, 313 (2002) and the Prima Facia elements (legal definition) of Assault and Battery did not appear on the face of the statement of facts in support of the complaint, therefore, the case was DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 CR 1604, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) having recorded a breath test of .13*. In this matter despite the fact that the arresting officer indicated that my client had failed ALL field sobriety test (FSTs), we were able provide the jury with evidence that the tests were administered in an unfair manner. The jury returned with a verdict of NOT GUILTY in less than Thirty (30) minutes.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2167 CR 1412, Charges of Assault, Disorderly Conduct and Disturbing the Peace against my client were DISMISSED: *

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1167 CR 0442, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) having been stopped at a MASSACHUSETTS STATE POLICE ROADBLOCK AT WHITE CITY PLAZA IN SHREWSBURY AND having recorded a breath test of .13*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2453 CR 0215, Charges of Assault & Battery against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No.:  2349 CR 0245, Felony Charges of Domestic Assault & Battery on an Individual 60 Years or Older and Domestic Assault and Battery against my client were DISMISSED on the day of Trial.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2121 CR 0463, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Larceny over $1,200.00 (a Felony) and Conspiracy.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1267 CR 1296, charges of Possession with Intent to Distribute a Class D Substance (marijuana), Drug Violation near a School or Park, Disorderly Conduct, Disturbing the Peace and Contributing to the delinquency of a Minor against my client were DISMISSED*.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 0967 CR 0248, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) having recorded a breath test of .13*.

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2464 CR 1372, our Motion to Suppress Breath Test Results, filed on behalf of my client charged with Operating Under the Influence (OUI, DUI, DWI or “Drunk Driving”), was ALLOWED. All evidence of my client’s Breath Test Results of .13were SUPPRESSED and therefore, inadmissible against him at trial.* If you have been accused of OUI and have taken the breath test (Breathalyzer) you must hire a lawyer with a thorough understanding of the Dräger Alcotest 9510, the requirements for admissibility of breath tests taken by this machine, and how to attempt to Suppress these results pursuant to Massachusetts General Law, Chapter 90, §24k, 501 Code Mass. Regs. §2.55. and Com. v. Pierre, 72 Mass.App.Ct. 230, 890 N.E.2d 152 (2008).

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1967 CR 0597, Charges of Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol and Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial despite having recorded a breath test of .12.*

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2167 CR 0643, our Motion to Suppress filed on behalf of our client was ALLOWED.  All evidence seized as a result of a warrantless stop and search of my client while driving were SUPPRESSED and therefore, inadmissible against him at trial.*  In this matter my client (who was charged with Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol) was stopped by a local police officer because one (1 of 2) of his license plate illumination lights were out.  We filed a Motion to Suppress pursuant to Mass.R.Crim.P. 13, the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, Article XIV of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights, and Massachusetts General Laws c. 276 § 1.  We argued that the license plate light being out was not a sufficient reason to stop, search and seize.  The stop was “pretextual” in nature and therefore unconstitutional.  Motion to Suppress all evidence ALLOWED.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1267 CR 1694, charges of Larceny by Check (16 Counts) against my client were DISMISSED*.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2167 CR 0829, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Assault and Battery (A&B), Assault and Battery (A&B) with a Dangerous Weapon, Two Counts of Assault and Battery (A&B) on a Police Officer and Reckless Operation of a Motor Vehicle.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2267 CR  0181, Charges of Leaving the Scene of Property Damage against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2267 CR 0624, Charges of Domestic Assault and Battery and Intimidation of a Witness against my client were DISMISSED*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1667 CR 0714, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI), Second Offense, and Operating After License Suspension having recorded a breath test of .11 AND .12.*

DISMISSED:  In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2412 CR 0327, Charges of Domestic Assault and Battery against my client were DISMISSED on the day of the trial readiness conference.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2216 CR 0785, Charges of Assault & Battery (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1567 CR 1786, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI) having recorded a breath test of .12*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1657 CR 0139, Charges of Operating Under the Influence of Drugs (OUID) Fourth Offense, against my client were DISMISSED based upon our Motion to Dismiss.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2348 CR 1435, Charges of Assault & Battery against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2348 CR 1132, Charges of Leaving the Scene of an Accident with Property Damage against my client were DISMISSED subject to the Brave Act/Valor Act.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2347 CR 1125, Felony Charges of Misleading a Police Investigation against my client were DISMISSED as a result of our Motion to Dismiss.*  In this matter we filed a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to M.G.L. c. 218, § 35A, (West 2d ed. 1983); Commonwealth v. Lyons, 397 Mass. 644, 492 N.E.2d 1142 (1986) and Commonwealth v. DiBennadetto, 436 Mass. 310, 313 (2002). Citing a failure to provide sufficient evidence to support the issuance of a Complaint.   The Judge allowed our Motion.  CASE DISMISSED.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2349 CR 0279, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI) despite recording a breath test of .12.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 CR 0787, Charges of Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI) and Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial despite my client recording a breath test of .12.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1662 CR 003340, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) having recorded a breath test of .12*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2064 CR 1153, charges of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DWI, DUI, “Drunk Driving”), Third Offense, were DISMISSED on the day of trial, *.  PRIOR TO DISMISSAL OF THIS CHARGE MY CLIENT WAS FACING A MANDATORY MINIMUM SIX MONTH PERIOD OF INCARCERATION IN THE HOUSE OF CORRECTION.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1467 CR 1440, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) having recorded a breath test of .12*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2167 CR 0643, Charges of Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol and Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle against my client were DISMISSED.*

In this matter we had filed a motion to suppress alleging that the officer’s stop, based on my client having a single license plate light out and moving WITHIN marked lanes, was pretextual and in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, Article XIV of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights, and Massachusetts General Laws c. 276 § 1 .  Our motion to suppress all evidence was allowed and therefore the prosecution had no evidence with which to proceed to trial.  ALL CHARGES DISMISSED.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1265 CR 1800, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) having recorded a breath test of .12*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1467 CR 0712, the charge of Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI, DWI or “Drunk Driving), Second Offense, against my client was DISMISSED on the day of trial despite having recorded a Breath Test of .12.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2066 CR 1227, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol, (OUI, DUI or DWI), having recorded a breath test of .11*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2249 CR 0334, Charges of Assault & Battery (A&B) on a Person Over 60 with Injury (Felony), Assault and Battery on a Family or Household Member and Resisting Arrest against my client were DISMISSED on the day of Trial.*  In this matter, my client engaged my services after having hired another lawyer and then terminating the prior lawyer.  After my engagement, all charges in this matter and those in another court (2162 CR 002329) were dismissed.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2267 CR 1342, Charges of Assault & Battery (A&B) on a Family or Household Member against my client were DISMISSED on the day of Trial.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1767 CR 0159, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI) despite recording a breath test of .11.* In this matter the jury deliberated for less than twenty minutes (20) before returning with a unanimous verdict of NOT GUILTY in favor or my client.

NOT IN VIOLATION OF PROBATION: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1067 CR 1025, after a full hearing, my client was found NOT IN VIOLATION OF PROBATION notwithstanding a subsequent arrest for Assault and Battery (A&B) while on probation.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2267 CR 0001, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI), Third Offense*.  Prior to the Jury returning with a NOT GUILTY verdict, my client was facing a mandatory minimum 6 months in jail (up to 2.5 years).  Upon the completion of the trial we immediately filed a motion to reinstate our client’s Massachusetts Drivers license which was suspended for 5 years and would have been suspended for an additional 8 years (13 years total) if the jury returned with a guilty verdict.

DISMISSED (No Probable Cause Found): In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 14 AC0302 WC, Charges of Assault and Battery (A&B), against my client were DISMISSED at the Clerk Magistrate’s Hearing.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2367 CR 0593, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Drugs (OUID) despite being involved in a minor accident, having admitted to taking Oxycontin and admitting that she could not perform field sobriety tests as a result of taking Oxycontin*.

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, , Superior Court Docket No. 13-0499-3, our Motion to Suppress All Evidence, filed on behalf of my client charged with Possession of Cocaine with Intent to Distribute was ALLOWED. All evidence, drugs and contraband, seized from my client as a result of a warrantless search and seizure were SUPPRESSED and therefore, inadmissible against him at trial. CASE DISMISSED.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2349 CR 0770, Charges of Leaving the Scene of an Accident with Property Damage and Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle against my client were DISMISSED PRIOR to arraignment.*  In this matter our client was scheduled to be arraigned for the above charges after an accident.  He was not present or arrested at the scene, or ever, and was not given the statutory right to a Clerk Magistrate hearing as required by MG.L. c. 218, § 35A. Mass.R.Crim.Pro. 3(g) and  Commonwealth v. DiBennadetto, 436 Mass. 310, 313 (2002).

We argued that the information contained within the ‘four corners’ of the statement of facts in support of this application for a criminal complaint were insufficient to establish probable cause or even the prima facia element of operation necessary for these charges and therefore upon our motion to dismiss, the complaint and ALL CHARGES were DISMISSED.

NOLLE PROSEQUI: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1367 CR 0288, charges of Assault and Battery with a Dangerous Weapon (A&B DW) and Assault and Battery (A&B) against my client were ‘NOLLE PROSSED’*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1413 CR 1184, Charges of Possession of a Class E Substance against my client were DISMISSED.*

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1267 CR 1296, our Motion to Suppress filed on behalf of my client was ALLOWED.  All evidence, drugs and contraband, seized from my client as a result of a warrantless search and seizure were SUPPRESSED and therefore, inadmissible against him at trial.  CASE DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1767 CR 1324, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI) and charges of Negligent Operation were dismissed prior to trial despite recording a breath test of .11.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2367 CR 0485, Two Charges of Assault & Battery on a Police Officer (A&B PO) against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1467 CR 2090, Charges of Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI) against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial, despite having recorded a breath test of .11.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2467 CR 0007, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI), Second Offense, despite having recorded a breath test of .10*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1567 CR 0931, Charges of Assault with a Dangerous Weapon (baseball bat), Conspiracy, Trespass, and Threat to Commit a Crime against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1267 CR 0770, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) having recorded a breath test of .10*.

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1667 CR 0934, our Motion to Suppress Breathalyzer Test Results was ALLOWED.  All evidence of Breathalyzer Tests administered to my client were SUPPRESSED and therefore, the Breathalyzer Test results of .17 are inadmissible against him at trial.*  ANYONE ARRESTED FOR OPERATING UNDER THE INFLUENCE WHO SUBMITTED TO A BREATHALYZER TEST SHOULD IMMEDIATELY CONTACT AN EXPERIENCED ATTORNEY AND CONSIDER FILING A MOTION TO SUPPRESS BREATHALYZER TEST RESULTS.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1167 CR 1210, charges of Assault and Battery (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1067 CR 0535, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) having recorded a breath test of .10*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No.:  2367 CR 0797, Felony Charges of Domestic Assault & Battery against my client were DISMISSED on the day of Trial.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2266 CR 1594, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Drugs (OUID) and NOT GUILTY  of THREE Counts of Assault & Battery on a Police Officer*.  It is difficult for the Prosecution to prove these charges at trial without a blood test and expert testimony to interpret those tests before a jury. At a minimum the Commonwealth would need to present: (1) reliable evidence as to the amount or concentration of the drug in the defendant’s system; and (2) expert testimony indicating that the concentration of the drug in the defendant’s system would impair his or her ability to operate a motor vehicle.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1167 CR —-, charges of Assault and Battery (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED prior to arraignement.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 CR 1650, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol and Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle.*

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No.: 1462 CR 4917, our Motion to Suppress Identification, filed on behalf of my client charged with Assault & Battery was ALLOWED. All identification of my client, acquired by an impermissibly suggestive identification procedure, were SUPPRESSED and therefore, inadmissible against her at trial.* CASE DISMISSED.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2367 CR 1484, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol and Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle*.   License immediately ordered reinstated.

DISMISSED PRIOR TO ARRAIGNMENT: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1562 CR 2632, the charges of Operating Under the Influence of Drugs (Second Offense), Negligent Operation of  a Motor Vehicle and Operating a Motor Vehicle while License Suspended for OUI against my client were DISMISSED PRIOR TO ARRAIGNMENT.*  Prior to dismissal my client was facing a mandatory minimum SIXTY (60) day period of incarceration, two year loss of license, Violation of Probation (VOP) and bail revocation. These charges were dismissed upon our Motion to Dismiss pursuant to M.G.L. c. 218, § 35A and Commonwealth v. Lyons, 397 Mass. 644, 492 N.E.2d 1142 (1986).

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1363 CR 0122, charges of Engaging in or Permitting Elder or Disabled Abuse against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 0967 CR 1343, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) having recorded a breath test of .10*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1067 CR 0686, charges of Assault and Battery (A&B) and Intimidation of a Witness against my client were DISMISSED.*

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1467 CR 1440, our Motion to Suppress Breathalyzer Test Results was ALLOWED. All evidence of a Breathalyzer Test administered to my client were SUPPRESSED and therefore, the Breathalyzer Test results of .12 are inadmissible against him at trial.* ANYONE ARRESTED FOR OPERATING UNDER THE INFLUENCE IN MASSACHUSETTS (OUI, DUI, DWI OR “DRUNK DRIVING”) WHO SUBMITTED TO A BREATHALYZER TEST SHOULD IMMEDIATELY FILE A MOTION TO SUPPRESS BREATHALYZER TEST RESULTS.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1267 CR 1215, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) having recorded a breath test of .11*.

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No.  1667 CR 0848,  our Motion in Limine to exclude breath test results was ALLOWED. Our client’s Breath Test Results of .19 are suppressed and inadmissible against him at trial. CLIENT FOUND NOT GUILTY AFTER TRIAL.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2267 CR 0044, Charges of Strangulation or Suffocation (Felony) and Assault & Battery against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2367 CR 1051, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol – Second Offense (OUI, DUI or DWI)*.

In this matter our client was subject to a FIVE YEAR LICENSE LOSS. Upon the NOT GUILTY VERDICT we immediately filed a Motion to Order the Registry of Motor Vehicles to Reinstate her license. The MOTION was ALLOWED and my client’s rights to operate were IMMEDIATELY restored.

NOLLE PROSEQUI: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1351 CR 0893, charges of Assault and Battery with a Dangerous Weapon (A&B DW) and Assault and Battery (A&B) against my client were ‘NOLLE PROSSED’*.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2021 CR 0392, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Drugs (OUID, DUID or DWID)*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2021 CR 0121, Two Counts of Assault & Battery (A&B)  against my client were DISMISSED on the day of Trial.  My client was also found NOT in Violation of Probation *.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2267 CR 1326, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI)*.   Client’s License immediately reinstated.

NO PROBABLE CAUSE: In Westborough Police Department v. Defendant, Docket No. 2367 AC 439, Charges of Violation of an Abuse Protection Order (MGL c. 209A Order) against my client were DISMISSED after NO PROBABLE CAUSE found at the Clerk Magistrate Hearing.*   In this matter the Westborough Police Department attempted to charge my client with a  Violation of an Abuse Protection Order (MGL c. 209A Order) for sending a letter to his landlord requesting that he be removed from the lease to the apartment which he and his wife previously shared.  However, abuse under the statute has a very specific definition, By “abuse” the law means: causing or attempting to cause another person physical harm, placing another person in, fear of immediate serious physical harm, or causing another person, by force or threat or duress to engage involuntarily in sexual relations.  When cross examined regarding the existence of any of the delineated types of abuse required by the statute the officer indicated honestly that no such abuse existed in this matter, thus NO PROBABLE CAUSE found.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2267 CR 1574, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol, Third Offense, despite being involved in an accident, admitting to consuming  several ‘Nips’ (small bottles of alcohol) having many opened and unopened Nips in his vehicle and failing ALL Field Sobriety Tests (FSTs)*.   In this matter my client was facing a mandatory minimum of 6 MONTHS in Jail and a THIRTEEN YEAR (13) Loss of License.

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1961 CR 0108, our Motion to Suppress Identification filed on behalf of our client was ALLOWED.  All identification of our client by the police witness is SUPPRESSED and therefore, inadmissible against him at trial.*  In this matter my client (who was charged with Possession with Intent to Distribute Heroin and Possession of Two Handguns and Ammunition) was the subject of an out of court and suggestive identification procedure during the execution of a search warrant.  We filed a Motion to Suppress pursuant to Mass.R.Crim.P. 13, Commonwealth v. Botelho, 369 Mass. 860 (1976), Commonwealth v. Walker, 460 Mass. 590 (2011), Commonwealth v. Silva-Santiago, 453 Mass. 782 , 794-795 (2009) and the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution.  We argued that the identification of my client was impermissibly suggestive and therefore unconstitutional.  Motion to Suppress all evidence ALLOWED.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2167 CR 0438, our Motion to Dismiss or Remand for Show Cause Hearing was ALLOWED.  Charges of Assault against my client were DISMISSED*.

MOTION TO SUPPRESS ALLOWED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2367 CR 0474, our Motion to Suppress Breath Test Results was ALLOWED.*  The breath test results of .13 were suppressed and thus excluded from evidence and admission against my client at trial.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2367 CR 1353, Charges of Assault & Battery on a Family or Household Member (A&B Domestic) against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2067 CR 0417, Charges of Assault & Battery (A&B)  against my client were DISMISSED on the day of Trial *.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1987 CR 0415, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI) and Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle having recorded a breath test of .09*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2467 CR 0382, Felony Charges of Falsifying a Registry of Motor Vehicles Document against my client were DISMISSED PRIOR TO ARRAIGNMENT.*  Client has NO CRIMINAL RECORD.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2367 CR 0361, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Domestic Assault & Battery and Strangulation or Suffocation*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2267 CR 1546, Charges of Domestic Assault and Battery (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED on the date of trial.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2267 CR 0421, Charges of Assault & Battery (2 Counts), Witness Intimidation and Threatening to Commit a Crime against my client were DISMISSED on the day of Trial.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2267 CR 0711, Charges of Violation of an Abuse Prevention Order (M.G.L. c. 209A) and Assault against my client were DISMISSED on the day of Trial.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2067 CR 0741, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Drugs (OUID, DUID or DWID) and Possession of a Class E Substance*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No.:  2364 CR 0528, Felony Charges of Witness Intimidation and Domestic Assault & Battery against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2367 CR 0936, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol .*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2364 CR 2563, Charges of Kidnapping against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial.* In this matter the prosecution was proceeding on a theory of parental kidnapping in violation of a court order.   The prosecution was unable to produce the order at trial.  Case DISMISSED based upon our motion to dismiss for failure to provide the required court order.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1667 CR 0221, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI).*

DECRIMINALIZED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No.:  2364 CR 1954, Charges of Possession of a Class B Substance (Cocaine) against my client were Decriminalized.*

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2465 CR 0100, our Motion to Suppress Breath Test Results, filed on behalf of my client charged with Operating Under the Influence (OUI, DUI, DWI or “Drunk Driving”), was ALLOWED. All evidence of my client’s Breath Test Results of .19 were SUPPRESSED and therefore, inadmissible against her at trial.* If you have been accused of OUI and have taken the breath test (Breathalyzer) you must hire a lawyer with a thorough understanding of the Dräger Alcotest 9510, the requirements for admissibility of breath tests taken by this machine, and how to attempt to Suppress these results pursuant to Massachusetts General Law, Chapter 90, §24k, 501 Code Mass. Regs. §2.55. and Com. v. Pierre, 72 Mass.App.Ct. 230, 890 N.E.2d 152 (2008).

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2067 CR 0516, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Assault & Battery Sixty Five or Older (A&B 65+)*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2047 CR 0536, Charges of Breaking and Entering and Malicious Destruction of Property against my client were DISMISSED on the day of Trial*.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 CR 1348, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (Second Offense) and Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle.*

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No.  1567 CR 1786,  our Motion in Limine to exclude breath test results was ALLOWED. Our client’s Breath Test Results of .12 are suppressed and inadmissible against him at trial.*  CLIENT FOUND NOT GUILTY AFTER TRIAL.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2367 CR  0294, Charges of Operating Under the Influence of Drugs (OUI Drugs or Drugged Driving) against my client were DISMISSED on the date of trial.*  It is difficult for the Prosecution to prove these charges at trial without a drug test of blood and expert testimony to interpret those tests before a jury. At a minimum the Commonwealth would need to present: (1) reliable evidence as to the amount or concentration of the drug in the defendant’s system; and (2) expert testimony indicating that the concentration of the drug in the defendant’s system would impair his or her ability to operate a motor vehicle.  No Such evidence exists in most OUID cases.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2248 CR 0985, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) Second Offense*.  As a result of a chemical test refusal (CTR), my client’s license was suspended for Three (3) years .  After winning the trial, as a result of our Motion to Reinstate License, his License was immediately reinstated by the court.

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No.  1667 CR 0714,  our Motion in Limine to exclude breath test results was ALLOWED. Our client’s Breath Test Results of .11 are suppressed and inadmissible against her at trial.* CLIENT FOUND NOT GUILTY AFTER TRIAL.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1366 CR 0120, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Drugs (OUID).*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2167 CR 1504, Charges of Assault & Battery with a Dangerous Weapon and Witness Intimidation (Felony) against my client were DISMISSED on the date of trial.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2267 CR 1090, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) having recorded a breath test of .09*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No.:  2367 AC 1296, Charges of Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle against my client were DISMISSED at the Clerk Magistrate Hearing.*  My client thus, has NO CRIMINAL RECORD.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 CR 1268, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) having recorded a breath test of .09*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2167 CR 0024, Charges of Assault & Battery (A&B)  and Intimidation of a Witness against my client were DISMISSED on the day of Trial*.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2367 CR 1657, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI)*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2367 CR 1350, Charges of Assault & Battery on a Family or Household Member (A&B Domestic) against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No.: 2367 CR 0189, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DWI, DUI, “Drunk Driving”)*.  As a result of this judgement, my client’s Massachusetts license was immediately reinstated upon our Motion to Reinstate License.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No.:  8967 CR 2114, Felony Charges of Malicious Destruction of Property, Breaking and Entering at Nighttime with the Intent to Commit a Felony, Larceny and Larceny of a Motor Vehicle against my client were DISMISSED PRIOR to arraignment.*  My client thus, has NO CRIMINAL RECORD of these FELONIES.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2467 CR 0412, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI), Second Offense*.   Prior to the finding of NOT GUILTY my client was facing a mandatory minimum 60 days in jail and a FIVE-YEAR LOSS OF LICENSE.  After the entry of the NOT GUILTY, my client received no criminal penalties and his LICENSE WAS ORDERED TO BE IMMEDIATELY RESTORED AS A RESULT OF OUR MOTION TO REINSTATE LICENSE WHICH WAS ALLOWED.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No.:  8967 CR 1400, Felony Charges of Larceny of a Motor Vehicle against my client were DISMISSED PRIOR to arraignment.*  My client thus, has NO CRIMINAL RECORD of these FELONIES.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1267 CR 0952, charges of Domestic Assault and Battery (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1167 CR 0444, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) having recorded a breath test of .09*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2362 CR 0071, Charges of Assault & Battery (A&B) on a Pregnant Victim against my client were DISMISSED on the day of Trial.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No.:  2264 CR 0469, Charges of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI), Reckless Operation of a Motor Vehicle and Leaving the Scene of an Accident against our client were DISMISSED .*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2267 CR 0409, Charges of Identity Fraud against my client were DISMISSED*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2321 CR 0565, Charges of Leaving the Scene of an Accident with Property Damage against my client were DISMISSED on the date of arraignment.*  In this matter our client was arraigned for the above charges after an accident.  He was not present or arrested at the scene, or ever, and was not given the statutory right to a Clerk Magistrate hearing as required by MG.L. c. 218, § 35A. Mass.R.Crim.Pro. 3(g) and  Commonwealth v. DiBennadetto, 436 Mass. 310, 313 (2002).

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2361 CR 0632, Charges of Assault & Battery on a Family or Household Member (A&B Domestic) against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2348 CR 0722, Charges of Intimidation of a Witness, Juror, Police Officer or Court Official (Felony) against my client were DISMISSED prior to arraignment. Therefore, my client has no record of this charge *

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1167 CR 1733, charges of Assault and Battery (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2167 CR 0811, Charges of Assault with a Dangerous Weapon against my client were DISMISSED on the day of Trial.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1067 CR 1823, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) having recorded a breath test of .09*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1267 CR 2138, charges of Assault & Battery on a Person Over the Age of Sixty or Disabled (A&B Over 60) against my client were DISMISSED*.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 0867 CR 1698, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) having recorded a breath test of .09*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 CR 0470, Charges of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI) and Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle against my client were DISMISSED as a result of our Motion to Suppress.* In this matter my client was stopped by an off duty campus police officer while travelling through an area town, no where near the officer’s campus or jurisdiction. It is well established that a police officer cannot make a stop or a warrantless arrest outside of the boundaries of the governmental unit by which he was appointed absent statutory authority to the contrary. Commonwealth v. Leblanc, 551 N.E.2d 906, 407 Mass 70 (1990) and Commonwealth v. Grise, 496 N.E.2d 162, 398 Mass 247 (1986).

There are only four recognized exceptions to this rule. One is that an officer may make an extraterritorial arrest for any arrestable offense, whether a felony or misdemeanor, initially committed in his presence and within his jurisdiction. See M.G.L. c. 41, §98A, Commonwealth v. Leblanc, Supra at 907, and Commonwealth v. Grise, Supra at 163-164. A second is that the officer has been sworn in as a special police officer in the town where the stop took place. See M.G.L. c. 41, §99, Commonwealth v. Andrews, 611 N.E.2d 252, 34 Mass.App.Ct. 324 (1993). A third is that the officer may make a stop or an arrest outside of his jurisdiction if he is requested to do so by a police officer who does have jurisdiction within the town in question. Commonwealth v. Morrissey, 660 N.E.2d, 422 Mass 1 (1996). And the fourth is that an officer may make an extraterritorial citizen’s arrest outside of his jurisdiction if he has probable cause to believe that a felony has been committed and that the person arrested committed it. See Commonwealth v. Dise, 583 N.E2d 271, 31 Mass.App.Ct. 701 (1991).

None of the enumerated exceptions applied in this matter. As a result out Motion to Suppress ALL Evidence was allowed. The Prosecution having no evidence to proceed on this matter, the case and ALL CHARGES WERE DISMISSED.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2121 CR 0502, Charges of Violation of an Abuse Prevention Order (MGL c. 209A) against my client were DISMISSED on the date of trial.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2167 CR 0422, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI)*.  In this matter the jury found my client NOT GUILTY within minutes of submitting several questions to the court.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2353 CR  0665, Felony Charges of Possession of a False or Stolen Registry of Motor Vehicle Document against my client were DISMISSED PRIOR to arraignment.*  My client thus, has NO CRIMINAL RECORD of this FELONY.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2221 CR 0152, Charges of Assault & Battery against my client were DISMISSED .*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2169 CR 0047, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol, (OUI, DUI or DWI).*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2167 CR 1176, Charges of Assault & Battery against my client were DISMISSED on the date of trial.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2162 CR 2329, Charges of Assault & Battery on a Person Over 65 or Disabled and Resisting Arrest against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2167 CR 0853, Charges of Domestic Assault & Battery against my client were DISMISSED *.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2167 CR 1127, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI).*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant,, Docket No. 2167 CR 1044, Charges of Assault & Battery on a Police Officer (Two Counts) against my client were DISMISSED on the date of our Motion to Supress.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 CR 1588, Felony Charges of Animal Cruelty against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1967 CR 0839, Charges of Assault & Battery and Felony Charges of Intimidation of a Witness against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. —- CR—-, charges of Possession of a Class E Substance and Possession within a School Zone against my client were DISMISSED prior to arraignment.  No criminal record.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 0867 CR 1340, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) having recorded a breath test of .09*.

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2267 CR 1093, our Motion to Suppress to exclude breath test results was ALLOWED. Our client’s Breath Test Results of .15 are suppressed and inadmissible against him at trial*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1267 CR 0673, two (2) counts of Assault and Battery (A&B DW) and Assault and Battery against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2267 CR 1094, charges of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DWI, DUI, “Drunk Driving”) and Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle were DISMISSED on the day of trial. *

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1967 CR 0752, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) despite recording a breath test of .08*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2167 CR 1213, Charges of Assault & Battery against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2167 CR 0782, Charges of Assault & Battery against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 CR 0511, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) and Negligent Operation, having recorded a breath test of .08*.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2067 CR 0666, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI) Second Offense*.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 CR 0646, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI).*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2167 CR 0699, Felony Charges of Malicious Destruction of Property against my client were DISMISSED *.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1967 CR 1478, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI), Second Offense*.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1367 CR 1464, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI), Second Offense, having recorded a breath test of .08*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1567 CR 0613, charges of Possession of a Class D substance (marijuana) with intent to Distribute against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1167 CR 0452, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) having recorded a breath test of .08*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1167 CR 1713, charges of Assault and Battery (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2021 CR 1054, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol, (OUI, DUI or DWI), Second Offense*.  Upon our motion, the client’s license, which had been suspended for Five (5) years as a result of this arrest, was immediately ordered reinstated.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1367 CR 1637, charges of Receiving Stolen Property and Possession of Burglarious Tools against my client were DISMISSED*.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 0867 CR 1641, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) having recorded a breath test of .08*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2067 CR 0379, Charges of Assault and Battery (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED PRIOR TO ARRAIGNMENT.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2067 CR 0945, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol, (OUI, DUI or DWI), Second Offense*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2267 CR 0527, Charges of Assault & Battery against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1967 CR 1538, Charges of Assault and Battery (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2067 CR 0022, Charges of Assault and Battery (A&B) with a Dangerous Weapon and Assault and Battery (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2067 CR 0888, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol, (OUI, DUI or DWI), Second Offense*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2154 CR 0154, Charges of Domestic Assault & Battery against my client were DISMISSED * on the day of trial.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1067 CR 2187, charges of Assault and Battery on a Police Officer (A&B PO) against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1567 CR 0250, charges of Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI, DWI or “Drunk Driving”) against my client were DISMISSED on the date of trial having recorded a breath test of .08.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1967 CR 1637, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI)*.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 CR 1109, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI) Second Offense.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1567 CR 1371, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) Third Offense.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1767 CR 0949, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI), Second Offense.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 CR 0020, Charges of Assault and Battery (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED on the date of trial.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1567 CR 0004, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI).*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1921 CR 0138, Felony Charges of Uttering a False Check and Forgery of a Check against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1921 CR 0224, Felony Charges of Forgery of a Check and Uttering a False Check against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1267 CR 1290, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) Third Offense*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 CR 0109, Charges of Possession of a Class A Substance against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1468 AC 0071, Charges of Assault with a Dangerous Weapon against my client were DISMISSED at the Probable Cause Hearing.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 CR 0745, Charges of Assault and Battery against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1567 CR 0606, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI), Second Offense and Failure to Stop for Police*.  In this matter, after a full trial, the jury returned with a unanimous verdict of NOT GUILTY after deliberating for approximately Thirteen (13) Minutes.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 CR 0847, Charges of Assault and Battery and Intimidation of a Witness (a felony) against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1267 CR 1602, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI), Second Offense.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 CR 1050, Charges of Assault and Battery against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1921 CR 1147, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI), Second Offense and Operating Without a License.* Prior to this NOT GUILTY verdict my client was facing a mandatory MINIMUM 5 year loss of license, two years of probation and sixty (60) days in jail.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 CR 0122, Charges of Solicitation for Prostitution, against my client were DISMISSED – PRIOR TO ARRAIGNMENT. As a result, my client has NO CRIMINAL RECORD.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1464 CR 3757, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI), Second Offense. Prior to Not Guilty Judgment, in addition to possible incarceration, my client was subject to a mandatory minimum Five (5) Year license suspension. License immediately reinstated.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 CR 0396, Charges of Assault and Battery and Intimidation of a Witness (a felony) against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 CR 1076, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Drugs.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1921 CR 0138, Felony Charges of Uttering a False Check and Forgery of a Check against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1921 CR 0224, Felony Charges of Forgery of a Check and Uttering a False Check against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1967 CR 1496, Felony Charges of Intimidation of a Witness and Assault & Battery against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1767 CR 1831, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI).*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1766 CR 1512, Charges of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Drugs, against my client were DISMISSED on the date of trial.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1666 CR 1251, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Drugs, Third Offense (OUID)*. PRIOR TO WINING THIS TRIAL MY CLIENT WAS FACING A MANDATORY MINIMUM SIX (6) MONTHS IN JAIL UP TO TWO AND A HALF YEARS. It is difficult for the Prosecution to prove these charges at trial without a drug test of blood or urine and expert testimony to interpret those tests before a jury. At a minimum the Commonwealth would need to present (1) reliable evidence as to the amount or concentration of the drug in the defendant’s system; and (2) expert testimony indicating that the concentration of the drug in the defendant’s system would impair his or her ability to operate a motor vehicle.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1366 CR 1238, charges of Larceny, Receiving a Stolen Credit Card and Improper Use of a Credit Card against my client were DISMISSED*.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1266 CR 1819, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI)*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1267 CR 1162, charges of Wanton Destruction of Property Over $250.00 against my client were DISMISSED*.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 0867 CR 1915, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) Third Offense*.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 CR 1529, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Domestic Assault & Battery.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1167 CR 1778, charges of Assault and Battery (A&B) and Assault and Battery with a Dangerous Weapon (A&B DW) against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1967 CR 0088, Charges of Domestic Assault & Battery (A&B) and two felony counts of Intimidation of a Witness against my client were DISMISSED on the day of Trial.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1167 CR 0450, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI)*.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1767 CR 1325, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI) and Operating to Endanger.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1267 CR 0270, charges of Domestic Assault & Battery and Use Without Authority of and Automobile against my client were DISMISSED*.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1367 CR 0214, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) Third Offense*.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 CR 0212, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI), Second Offense.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 CR 1580, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of alcohol.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 0667 CR 1761, charges of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 CR 0109, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Assault on a Family or Household Member.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1767 CR 1335, charges of Possession of a Class B Substance (Cocaine) against my client were DISMISSED on the date of our Motion to Suppress.*

NOT GUILTY: In  Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1764 CR 0272, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Drugs (OUID)*.  It is difficult for the Prosecution to prove these charges at trial without a drug test and expert testimony to interpret those tests before a jury.  In this case the Commonwealth actually conducted a drug test, but the test they conducted was the wrong test (as they typically are) and we were also able to exclude testimony from the Prosecution’s so called Drug Recognition Expert (DRE).

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1465 CR 1462, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI), Second Offense.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2167 CR 1138, our Motion to Dismiss was ALLOWED.  Charges of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol, (OUI, DUI or DWI), Second Offense against my client were DISMISSED.*  In this matter, the Police failed to advise the defendant of his right to an independent medical examination pursuant to M.G.L. c. 263, § 5(A) and Commonwealth v. Andrade, 389 Mass. 874, 876 (1983).  Our motion to dismiss on this basis was allowed, ALL CHARGES DISMISSED.

In this same matter our Motion to Reinstate the client’s license, which had been suspended for Five (5) years as a result of this arrest, was ALLOWED and the client’s license was immediately ordered reinstated.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1068 CR 0616, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI)*.

Petition to Seal Criminal Record Allowed: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No.  1167 CR 0222,  our Petition to Seal Criminal Record was ALLOWED. Our client’s prior criminal record has been sealed and excluded from public access.*

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No.: 1448 CR 1665, our Motion In Limine to Preclude Introduction of so called Certified “Drug Recognition Expert (DRE)” Testimony and Field Sobriety Tests, filed on behalf of my client charged with Operating Under the Influence of Drugs was ALLOWED. The proposed prosecution expert (“Certified DRE”) will not be allowed to testify at trial and thus all so called “expert” evidence is inadmissible against him at trial. If you have been charged with Operating Under the Influence of Drugs you must challenge all prosecution evidence including so called “Expert” testimony through the use of a police officer given a certificate as a “Certified DRE”. These so called “DRE’s” are not experts. The Commonwealth cannot establish the reliability of the basis of their expert testimony, based on the standards set by Federal and Massachusetts law pursuant to Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S, 579 (1993) and Commonwealth v. Lanigan, 419 Mass. 15, 641 N.E. 2d 1342 (1994). Hire a lawyer with a thorough and experienced understanding of this issue. CHARGES OF OPERATING UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF DRUGS (OUID) DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1667 CR 0610, Charges of Assault and Battery on a Family or Household Member (A&B Domestic) and Threatning to Commit Murder, against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1967 CR 1495, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) and Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1167 CR 0931, charges of Possession With Intent to Distribute a Class C Substance, Possession of a Class B Substance and Conspiracy to Violate Controlled Substance Laws against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 0967 CR 1219, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI)*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1205 CR 0747, charges of Being a Fugitive from Justice against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 CR 1582, Charges of Assault with a Dangerous Weapon against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 0867 CR 1576, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI)*.

DISMISSED (No Probable Cause Found): In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1801 AC 7217, Charges of Assault and Battery (A&B), against my client were DISMISSED at the Clerk Magistrate’s Hearing.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1767 CR 0181, Charges of Assault & Battery (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1667 CR 0863, Charges of Assault & Battery (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial.*

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1667 CR 0476, our Motion to Suppress Breathalyzer Test Results was ALLOWED.  All evidence of Breathalyzer Tests administered to my client were SUPPRESSED and therefore, the Breathalyzer Test results of .16 and .15 are inadmissible against him at trial.*  ANYONE ARRESTED FOR OPERATING UNDER THE INFLUENCE WHO SUBMITTED TO A BREATHALYZER TEST SHOULD IMMEDIATELY CONTACT AN EXPERIENCED ATTORNEY AND CONSIDER FILING A MOTION TO SUPPRESS BREATHALYZER TEST RESULTS.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No.  1667 CR 0894,  Charges Assault & Battery (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED.*

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1667 CR 0863, The Commonwealth’s Motion to Admit Excited Utterance as an Exception to the Hearsay Rule DENIED.  All hearsay evidence SUPPRESSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1767 CR 1291, charges of Assault & Battery and Strangulation or Suffocation against my client were DISMISSED on the date of Trial.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No.  1767 CR 0477, Charges of (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED  on the date of trial.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1167 CR 0448, charges of Possession With Intent to Distribute a Class C Substance against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1967 CR 0734, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) Second Offense*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 CR 1076, Charges of Possession of a Class E Substance against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1462 CR 4917, charges of Assault & Battery (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED on the date of trial.* This dismissal occurred after our two prior Motions to Suppress were ALLOWED prohibiting the prosecution from introducing any evidence identifying my client (or the Co-Defendant) at trial.

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No: 0867 CR 2716, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI)*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1167 CR 1699, charges of Possession With Intent to Distribute a Class D Substance against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No: 0867 CR 1917, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI)*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1367 CR 0608, charges of Possession of a Class B Substance against my client were DISMISSED.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1767 CR 1832, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI or DWI)having recorded a breath test of .09.*

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1567 CR 0613, our Motion to Suppress All Evidence, filed on behalf of my client charged with Possession of a Class D substance (marijuana) with intent to Distribute in violation of M.G.L. c. 94C, § 32C(a), was ALLOWED. All evidence, drugs and contraband, seized from my client as a result of a warrantless search and seizure were SUPPRESSED and therefore, inadmissible against him at trial. ALL CHARGES DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1767 CR 0027, Charges of Intimidating a Witness against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial.*

NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1267 CR 2033, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI)*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1567 CR 0012, Charges of Assault and Battery (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1567 CR 1137, charges of Assault and Battery (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1367 CR 2203, charges of Assault and Battery (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1367 CR 1134, charges of Assault and Battery (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 0921 CR 1952, Charges of Possession of a Class E Substance against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1267 CR 0963, charges of Sexual Conduct for a Fee and Annoying Accosting a Person of the Opposite Sex against my client were DISMISSED on the day of trial.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1462 CR 1256, Charges of Assault and Battery on a Police Officer (A&B P.O.) against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1967 CR 0768, Charges of Assault & Battery (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1467 CR 1794, charges of Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI, DWI or “Drunk Driving”) against my client were DISMISSED on the date of trial.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1367 CR 0714, charges of Assault and Battery, Trespassing and Disorderly Conduct against my client were DISMISSED on the date of trial.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1368 CR 1591, charges of Leaving the Scene of Property Damage against my client were DISMISSED .*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1367 CR 0791, charges of Assault and Battery against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1267 CR 1279, charges of Assault and Battery against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 13 DL 0530WC, charges of Possession of a Class D Substance with Intent to Distribute and Drug Violation Near a School or Park against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1249 CR 1412, charges of Assault and Battery, Trespassing and Disorderly Conduct against my client were DISMISSED on the date of trial.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1367 CR 0945, charges of Child Endangerment While Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 0967 CR 0628, two (2) counts of Assault and Battery (A&B DW) against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1467 CR 2100, charges of Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI, DUI, DWI or “Drunk Driving”), Second Offense and three (3) Counts of Possession of a Class E Substance against my client were DISMISSED on the date of trial.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1167 CR 0845, Charges of Violation of Probation against my client were DISMISSED on the day of the VOP Hearing.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1167 CR 1618, charges of Assault & Battery against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1067 CR 1664, 15 Counts of Breaking and Entering a Vehicle or Boat in the Nighttime and 9 Counts of Larceny Over $250.00 against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1167 CR 0970, charges of Use of a Motor Vehicle Without Authority against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1167 CR 0070, charges of Malicious Destruction of Property Over $250.00 against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 0967 CR 2071, two (2) counts of Indecent Assault and Battery on a Child Under 14 (Indecent A&B Under 14) against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1167 CR 0970, charges of Receiving Stolen Property against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1067 CR 0145, 2 counts of Assault & Battery with a Dangerous Weapon (A&B DW) against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1067 CR 0145, charges of Violation of a 209A Abuse Prevention Order (“Violation of a Restraining Order”) against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 0867 CR 1530, charges of Assault and Battery with a Dangerous Weapon (A&B DW) against my client were DISMISSED.*

NO PROBABLE CAUSE: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 18 AC 732, Charges of Indecent Exposure and Disorderly Conduct against my client were DISMISSED AS A RESULT OF NO PROBABLE CAUSE.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1567 AC 0377, charges of Violation of a Harassment Prevention Order (M.G.L. c. 258E Order) against my client were DISMISSED at the Probable Cause Hearing.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 0867 CR 2529, charges of Possession With Intent to Distribute a Class C Substance against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1167 CR 0970, charges of Receiving a Stolen Credit Card against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1067 CR 1686, charges of Possession of a Class E Substance against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1167 CR 1210, 2 Counts of Assault and Battery (A&B) and Threatening to Commit a Crime against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1167 CR 0145, charges of Possession of a Class E & Class B Substance against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1267 CR 1257, charges of Domestic Assault & Battery against my client were DISMISSED*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1067 CR 0145, charges of Assault & Battery with a Dangerous Weapon (A&B DW) against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 0967 CR 1158, charges of Possession of a Class B Substance and Receiving Stolen Property against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1067 CR 1005, charges of Malicious Destruction of Property against my client were DISMISSED*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1267 CR 0406, Charges of Assault and Battery (A&B), Intimidation of a Witness and Malicious Destruction of Property against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1067 CR 0990, charges of Assault and Battery on a Police Officer (A&B PO) against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1067 CR 0990, charges of Possession of a Burglarious Instrument, Receiving Stolen Property and Conspiracy against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1367 CR 0703, charges of Violation of a Harassment Prevention order against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1367 CR 0803, charges of Violation of a Harassment Prevention order against my client were DISMISSED prior to arraignment.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 0967 CR 1166, charges of Violation of a 209A Abuse Prevention order against my client were DISMISSED prior to arraignment.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1167 CR 1499, charges of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) were DISMISSED on the trial date*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1267 CR 0275, charges of Use of Disorderly Conduct against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1967 CR 0543, Charges of Possession of a Class B Substance against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1267 CR 0395, charges of Attempting to Commit a Crime against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 0967 CR 1166, charges of Violation of a 209A Abuse Prevention order against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 0967 CR 1425, charges of Assault & Battery (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1067 CR 1118, charges of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) were DISMISSED having recorded a breath test of .14*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1167 CR 0050, charges of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) were DISMISSED having recorded a breath test of .14*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1067 CR 1987, charges of Violation of a 209A Abuse Prevention Order (“Violation of a Restraining Order”) against my client were DISMISSED.*

NO PROBABLE CAUSE: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. — —, Charges of Assault and Battery against my client were DISMISSED at the probable cause hearing. *

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1067 CR 1900, charges of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (OUI) were DISMISSED on the trial date*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1167 CR 1282, charges of Operating After Suspension for OUI and Failure to Stop for a Police Officer against my client were DISMISSED.*

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No.: 1462 CR 4917, our SECOND Motion to Suppress Identification, filed on behalf of my client charged with Assault & Battery was ALLOWED. All identification of my client, acquired by an impermissibly suggestive identification procedure, were SUPPRESSED and therefore, inadmissible against her at trial. This motion was allowed after our prior Motion to Suppress in this same matter was allowed. Thereafter, the police attempted a SECOND identification procedure utilizing the same unconstitutional and tainted methods in violation of Commonwealth v. Walker, 460 Mass. 590 (2011) and Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471 (1973) as “fruit of the poisonous tree”. CASE DISMISSED.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1267 CR 0395, charges of Attempting to Commit a Crime against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1567 CR 0165, charges of Assault and Battery (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1462 CR 11087, the Felony charge of Malicious Destruction of Property over $250.00 and Leaving the Scene of Property Damage against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1167 CR 0262, charges of Possession of Burglarious Instrument, Attempting to Commit a Crime and Trespassing against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1021 CR 1971, charges of Assault and Battery (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1467 AC 0331, Charges of Disturbing the Peace and Distributing Alcohol to a Minor against my client were DISMISSED at the Clerk Magistrate’s Hearing.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1567 CR 1519, charges of Violation of an Abuse Prevention Order (M.G.L. c. 209A Order) against my client were DISMISSED on the date of trial *.

NO PROBABLE CAUSE: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 AC 0685, there was NO PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND to Charges of Intimidation of a Witness, Disorderly Conduct and Exploding Fireworks against my client at the Clerk Magistrate’s hearing. *

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1367 CR 2205, charges of Being a Fugitive from Justice against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. (Marlborough D.C. No Probable Cause), Charges of Assault and Battery (A&B) (Alleging a Serious Bodily Injury) against my client were DISMISSED at the Clerk Magistrate’s Hearing.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1967 CR 1197, Charges of Assault & Battery against my client were DISMISSED.*

SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1467 CR 2090, our Motion to Suppress Breath Test Results, filed on behalf of my client charged with Operating Under the Influence (OUI, DUI, DWI or “Drunk Driving”), was ALLOWED. All evidence of my client’s Breath Test Results of .11 were SUPPRESSED and therefore, inadmissible against her at trial.* If you have been accused of OUI and have taken the breath test (Breathalyzer) you must hire a lawyer with a thorough understanding of the Dräger Alcotest 9510, the requirements for admissibility of breath tests taken by this machine, and how to attempt to Suppress these results pursuant to Massachusetts General Law, Chapter 90, §24k, 501 Code Mass. Regs. §2.55. and Com. v. Pierre, 72 Mass.App.Ct. 230, 890 N.E.2d 152 (2008).

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1667 CR 1369, Charges of Intimidation of a Witness against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1557 CR 0215, the Felony Charge of Malicious Destruction of Property Over $250.00 and Disorderly Conduct against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1567 CR 1570, charges of Possession with Intent to Distribute Drugs (M.G.L. c94C, §32C(a)) against my client were DISMISSED on the date of Motion to Suppress*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1767 CR 0608, Charges of Larceny Over $250.00 and Shoplifting against my client were DISMISSED on the day of arraignment.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1567 CR 0671, charges of Possession with Intent to Distribute Drugs (M.G.L. c94C, §32C(a)) against my client were DISMISSED on the date of Motion to Suppress*.

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No.  1767 CR 0478, Charges of (A&B) against my client were DISMISSED  on the date of trial.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1767 CR 1795, Charges of Leaving the Scene of an Accident against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1767 CR 1928, Charges of Leaving the Scene of an Accident with Property Damage against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1667 CR 0542, Two counts of Assault & Battery (A&B) and one count of Intimidation of a Witness, Juror or Court Official against my client were DISMISSED.*

NO PROBABLE CAUSE: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1867 AC 0704, there was NO PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND to Charges of Shoplifting by Recording a False Value against my client at the probable cause hearing. *

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2367 CR 0186, Charges of Being a Fugitive from Justice on a Court Warrant (Fugitive from Justice) against my client were DISMISSED.*

DISMISSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1567 CR 1178, charges of Leaving the Scene of an Accident with Property Damage against my client were DISMISSED.*

* Since December 2008.  Counsel does not guarantee the same or similar outcome in your case. *