Press Release by the National Advocacy For DUI Defense
Michael Murray Identified as One of the Top DUI Attorneys in Massachusetts by the National Advocacy for DUI Defense (NAFDD)
Michael Murray is a member of the National Advocacy for DUI Defense (NAFDD), LLC, an organization that awards the nation’s best private Driving Under the Influence (DUI) attorneys.
NAFDD identifies the top criminal defense attorneys in each state based upon their experience, reputation, and achievements, among other factors. Those who are selected spend a significant portion of their practice representing individuals accused of OUI offenses (sometimes called DWI, DUI, DWII, OVI, OWI or OUII).
NAFDD’s selection criteria are driven by a number of considerations. To meet minimum eligibility requirements, an attorney (1) must be licensed and in good standing with his or her state bar organization, (2) must be in private practice, (3) has to have practiced DUI law for at least seven years, and (4) must devote a significant portion of his or her practice to DUI defense. Additional factors include:
● Total length of time the attorney has been practicing criminal law
● Number of DUI clients the attorney has represented
● Jury trial experience
● Bench trial experience
● DUI case results
● Formal DUI training
● DUI publications
● DUI presentations
● Available peer reviews
● Available client reviews
● DUI-related achievements and/or awards
● History of ethical disciplinary actions
Archives
Top DUI Attorneys in Massachusetts
Press Release by the National Advocacy For DUI Defense
Michael Murray Identified as One of the Top DUI Attorneys in Massachusetts by the National Advocacy for DUI Defense (NAFDD)
Michael Murray is a member of the National Advocacy for DUI Defense (NAFDD), LLC, an organization that awards the nation’s best private Driving Under the Influence (DUI) attorneys.
NAFDD identifies the top criminal defense attorneys in each state based upon their experience, reputation, and achievements, among other factors. Those who are selected spend a significant portion of their practice representing individuals accused of OUI offenses (sometimes called DWI, DUI, DWII, OVI, OWI or OUII).
NAFDD’s selection criteria are driven by a number of considerations. To meet minimum eligibility requirements, an attorney (1) must be licensed and in good standing with his or her state bar organization, (2) must be in private practice, (3) has to have practiced DUI law for at least seven years, and (4) must devote a significant portion of his or her practice to DUI defense. Additional factors include:
● Total length of time the attorney has been practicing criminal law
● Number of DUI clients the attorney has represented
● Jury trial experience
● Bench trial experience
● DUI case results
● Formal DUI training
● DUI publications
● DUI presentations
● Available peer reviews
● Available client reviews
● DUI-related achievements and/or awards
● History of ethical disciplinary actions
Top criminal defense attorneys Suppress ALL Evidence Case Dismissed
Top criminal defense lawyers Suppress ALL Evidence Case Dismissed: SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1567 CR 0613, our Motion to Suppress All Evidence, filed on behalf of my client charged with Possession of a Class D substance (marijuana) with intent to Distribute in violation of M.G.L. c. 94C, § 32C(a), was ALLOWED. All evidence, drugs and contraband, seized from my client as a result of a warrantless search and seizure were SUPPRESSED and therefore, inadmissible against him at trial. ALL CHARGES DISMISSED.*
Top criminal defense attorneys Near Me Suppress ALL Evidence Case Dismissed
Top criminal defense lawyers Near Me Suppress ALL Evidence Case Dismissed: SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1567 CR 0613, our Motion to Suppress All Evidence, filed on behalf of my client charged with Possession of a Class D substance (marijuana) with intent to Distribute in violation of M.G.L. c. 94C, § 32C(a), was ALLOWED. All evidence, drugs and contraband, seized from my client as a result of a warrantless search and seizure were SUPPRESSED and therefore, inadmissible against him at trial. ALL CHARGES DISMISSED.*
Top criminal defense attorneys Woburn Suppress ALL Evidence Case Dismissed
Top criminal defense lawyers Woburn Suppresses ALL Evidence Case Dismissed: SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1567 CR 0613, our Motion to Suppress All Evidence, filed on behalf of my client charged with Possession of a Class D substance (marijuana) with intent to Distribute in violation of M.G.L. c. 94C, § 32C(a), was ALLOWED. All evidence, drugs and contraband, seized from my client as a result of a warrantless search and seizure were SUPPRESSED and therefore, inadmissible against him at trial. ALL CHARGES DISMISSED.*
Top criminal defense attorneys Northborough Suppress ALL Evidence Case Dismissed
Top criminal defense lawyers Northborough Suppress ALL Evidence Case Dismissed: SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1567 CR 0613, our Motion to Suppress All Evidence, filed on behalf of my client charged with Possession of a Class D substance (marijuana) with intent to Distribute in violation of M.G.L. c. 94C, § 32C(a), was ALLOWED. All evidence, drugs and contraband, seized from my client as a result of a warrantless search and seizure were SUPPRESSED and therefore, inadmissible against him at trial. ALL CHARGES DISMISSED.*
Top criminal defense attorneys Marlborough Suppress ALL Evidence Case Dismissed
Top criminal defense lawyers Marlborough Suppress ALL Evidence Case Dismissed: SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1567 CR 0613, our Motion to Suppress All Evidence, filed on behalf of my client charged with Possession of a Class D substance (marijuana) with intent to Distribute in violation of M.G.L. c. 94C, § 32C(a), was ALLOWED. All evidence, drugs and contraband, seized from my client as a result of a warrantless search and seizure were SUPPRESSED and therefore, inadmissible against him at trial. ALL CHARGES DISMISSED.*
Top criminal defense attorneys Westborough Suppress ALL Evidence Case Dismissed
Top criminal defense lawyers Westborough Suppress ALL Evidence Case Dismissed: SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1567 CR 0613, our Motion to Suppress All Evidence, filed on behalf of my client charged with Possession of a Class D substance (marijuana) with intent to Distribute in violation of M.G.L. c. 94C, § 32C(a), was ALLOWED. All evidence, drugs and contraband, seized from my client as a result of a warrantless search and seizure were SUPPRESSED and therefore, inadmissible against him at trial. ALL CHARGES DISMISSED.*
Top criminal defense attorneys Worcester Suppress ALL Evidence Case Dismissed
Top criminal defense lawyers Worcester Suppress ALL Evidence Case Dismissed: SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1567 CR 0613, our Motion to Suppress All Evidence, filed on behalf of my client charged with Possession of a Class D substance (marijuana) with intent to Distribute in violation of M.G.L. c. 94C, § 32C(a), was ALLOWED. All evidence, drugs and contraband, seized from my client as a result of a warrantless search and seizure were SUPPRESSED and therefore, inadmissible against him at trial. ALL CHARGES DISMISSED.*
Top criminal defense attorneys Boston Suppress ALL Evidence Case Dismissed
Top criminal defense lawyers Boston Suppress ALL Evidence Case Dismissed: SUPPRESSED: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 1567 CR 0613, our Motion to Suppress All Evidence, filed on behalf of my client charged with Possession of a Class D substance (marijuana) with intent to Distribute in violation of M.G.L. c. 94C, § 32C(a), was ALLOWED. All evidence, drugs and contraband, seized from my client as a result of a warrantless search and seizure were SUPPRESSED and therefore, inadmissible against him at trial. ALL CHARGES DISMISSED.*