Top Criminal defense attorneys Marlborough District Court – Here is what the Clients Say: “As this was my first experience in the criminal court system I was very apprehensive about what was going to happen to me. At my arraignment Mike took the time. I was immediately impressed with his demeanor and professionalism. Needless to say I chose him to represent me and I know now that it was the best decision I could have made! Mike worked diligently for me and treated me as more of a friend than a client. With all the choices you have if you need a lawyer there’s no doubt in my mind that Attorney Murray should be everyone’s only choice. Thanks again Mike. I appreciate all of your help!” Paul Holmes
Archives
Top Criminal defense attorneys Westborough District Court – Here is what the Clients Say
Top Criminal defense attorneys Worcester District Court – Here is what the Clients Say: “As this was my first experience in the criminal court system I was very apprehensive about what was going to happen to me. At my arraignment Mike took the time. I was immediately impressed with his demeanor and professionalism. Needless to say I chose him to represent me and I know now that it was the best decision I could have made! Mike worked diligently for me and treated me as more of a friend than a client. With all the choices you have if you need a lawyer there’s no doubt in my mind that Attorney Murray should be everyone’s only choice. Thanks again Mike. I appreciate all of your help!” Paul Holmes
Top Criminal defense attorneys Worcester District Court – Here is what the Clients Say
Top Criminal defense attorneys Worcester District Court – Here is what the Clients Say: “As this was my first experience in the criminal court system I was very apprehensive about what was going to happen to me. At my arraignment Mike took the time. I was immediately impressed with his demeanor and professionalism. Needless to say I chose him to represent me and I know now that it was the best decision I could have made! Mike worked diligently for me and treated me as more of a friend than a client. With all the choices you have if you need a lawyer there’s no doubt in my mind that Attorney Murray should be everyone’s only choice. Thanks again Mike. I appreciate all of your help!” Paul Holmes
Top Criminal defense attorneys Boston Municipal Court – Here is what the Clients Say
Top Criminal defense attorneys Boston Municipal Court – Here is what the Clients Say: “As this was my first experience in the criminal court system I was very apprehensive about what was going to happen to me. At my arraignment Mike took the time. I was immediately impressed with his demeanor and professionalism. Needless to say I chose him to represent me and I know now that it was the best decision I could have made! Mike worked diligently for me and treated me as more of a friend than a client. With all the choices you have if you need a lawyer there’s no doubt in my mind that Attorney Murray should be everyone’s only choice. Thanks again Mike. I appreciate all of your help!” Paul Holmes
Top Criminal defense attorneys Massachusetts – Here is what the Clients Say
Top Criminal defense attorneys Massachusetts – Here is what the Clients Say: “As this was my first experience in the criminal court system I was very apprehensive about what was going to happen to me. At my arraignment Mike took the time. I was immediately impressed with his demeanor and professionalism. Needless to say I chose him to represent me and I know now that it was the best decision I could have made! Mike worked diligently for me and treated me as more of a friend than a client. With all the choices you have if you need a lawyer there’s no doubt in my mind that Attorney Murray should be everyone’s only choice. Thanks again Mike. I appreciate all of your help!” Paul Holmes
Top OUI Drugs Lawyer Wins Again
Top OUI Drugs Lawyer wins Again: NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2266 CR 1594, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Drugs (OUID) and NOT GUILTY of THREE Counts of Assault & Battery on a Police Officer*. It is difficult for the Prosecution to prove these charges at trial without a drug test of blood and expert testimony to interpret those tests before a jury. At a minimum the Commonwealth would need to present: (1) reliable evidence as to the amount or concentration of the drug in the defendant’s system; and (2) expert testimony indicating that the concentration of the drug in the defendant’s system would impair his or her ability to operate a motor vehicle. No Such evidence exists in most OUID cased. The police officer IS NOT AN EXPERT. Hire an OUID lawyer with experience and a thorough understanding of the OUI Drugs law in Massachusetts and what the Prosecution must do to prove these crimes.
Top OUI Drugs Lawyer Near Me Wins Again
Top OUI Drugs Lawyer Near Me Wins Again: NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2266 CR 1594, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Drugs (OUID) and NOT GUILTY of THREE Counts of Assault & Battery on a Police Officer*. It is difficult for the Prosecution to prove these charges at trial without a drug test of blood and expert testimony to interpret those tests before a jury. At a minimum the Commonwealth would need to present: (1) reliable evidence as to the amount or concentration of the drug in the defendant’s system; and (2) expert testimony indicating that the concentration of the drug in the defendant’s system would impair his or her ability to operate a motor vehicle. No Such evidence exists in most OUID cased. The police officer IS NOT AN EXPERT. Hire an OUID lawyer with experience and a thorough understanding of the OUI Drugs law in Massachusetts and what the Prosecution must do to prove these crimes.
Top OUI Drugs Lawyer Framingham Wins Again
Top OUI Drugs Lawyer Framingham Wins Again: NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2266 CR 1594, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Drugs (OUID) and NOT GUILTY of THREE Counts of Assault & Battery on a Police Officer*. It is difficult for the Prosecution to prove these charges at trial without a drug test of blood and expert testimony to interpret those tests before a jury. At a minimum the Commonwealth would need to present: (1) reliable evidence as to the amount or concentration of the drug in the defendant’s system; and (2) expert testimony indicating that the concentration of the drug in the defendant’s system would impair his or her ability to operate a motor vehicle. No Such evidence exists in most OUID cased. The police officer IS NOT AN EXPERT. Hire an OUID lawyer with experience and a thorough understanding of the OUI Drugs law in Massachusetts and what the Prosecution must do to prove these crimes.
Top OUI Drugs Lawyer Woburn Wins Again
Top OUI Drugs Lawyer Woburn Wins Again: NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2266 CR 1594, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Drugs (OUID) and NOT GUILTY of THREE Counts of Assault & Battery on a Police Officer*. It is difficult for the Prosecution to prove these charges at trial without a drug test of blood and expert testimony to interpret those tests before a jury. At a minimum the Commonwealth would need to present: (1) reliable evidence as to the amount or concentration of the drug in the defendant’s system; and (2) expert testimony indicating that the concentration of the drug in the defendant’s system would impair his or her ability to operate a motor vehicle. No Such evidence exists in most OUID cased. The police officer IS NOT AN EXPERT. Hire an OUID lawyer with experience and a thorough understanding of the OUI Drugs law in Massachusetts and what the Prosecution must do to prove these crimes.
Top OUI Drugs Lawyer Northborough Wins Again
Top OUI Drugs Lawyer Northborough Wins Again: NOT GUILTY: In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Defendant, Docket No. 2266 CR 1594, after trial, my client was found NOT GUILTY of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Drugs (OUID) and NOT GUILTY of THREE Counts of Assault & Battery on a Police Officer*. It is difficult for the Prosecution to prove these charges at trial without a drug test of blood and expert testimony to interpret those tests before a jury. At a minimum the Commonwealth would need to present: (1) reliable evidence as to the amount or concentration of the drug in the defendant’s system; and (2) expert testimony indicating that the concentration of the drug in the defendant’s system would impair his or her ability to operate a motor vehicle. No Such evidence exists in most OUID cased. The police officer IS NOT AN EXPERT. Hire an OUID lawyer with experience and a thorough understanding of the OUI Drugs law in Massachusetts and what the Prosecution must do to prove these crimes.